I'm sure its been discussed on here before but I thought i'd just pass on this information I have regarding the accuracy on these tests. I have clients ask about them often and I try to be pretty honest about them.
I was still working in vet hospitals as a CVT when these tests stated becoming very popular. The clinic I was in at the time had a sales rep from one of the major breed genetic ID companies (I can't recall the name now) contact us and wanted us to start carrying the tests and wanted to give us a presentation and a few free tests to try them out. Being typical CVTs we were up for learning anything new as well as free products so we had the rep come out.
The presentation was very convincing and good. The rep knew his stuff and could answer every question we had. He had all of us sold and eager to start selling the tests to clients.
While reading over the literature the sales rep left for us we happen to see a statistic the rep conveniently left out. In tiny print the company had put that in a control group of purebred labs that had verified pedigrees for many generations, the test results were around 70% accurate.
That's right, about 70% of the purebred labs tested came back purebred, the other 30% purebred labs were false or failed tests. We were pretty upset that this fairly important fact was left out by the sales rep and we refused to carry the tests.
The other thing that concerned me was that the tests we carried required a blood sample, some of those tests owners can order only require a saliva sample so I can only imagine how truly accurate those are. That was well over 3 years ago though so the tests could be more accurate but I have read a few previous comments people have made here that make me think otherwise. Just thought i'd pass that information on, I have never seen it mentioned anywhere else so I don't think it is common knowledge...
I was still working in vet hospitals as a CVT when these tests stated becoming very popular. The clinic I was in at the time had a sales rep from one of the major breed genetic ID companies (I can't recall the name now) contact us and wanted us to start carrying the tests and wanted to give us a presentation and a few free tests to try them out. Being typical CVTs we were up for learning anything new as well as free products so we had the rep come out.
The presentation was very convincing and good. The rep knew his stuff and could answer every question we had. He had all of us sold and eager to start selling the tests to clients.
While reading over the literature the sales rep left for us we happen to see a statistic the rep conveniently left out. In tiny print the company had put that in a control group of purebred labs that had verified pedigrees for many generations, the test results were around 70% accurate.
That's right, about 70% of the purebred labs tested came back purebred, the other 30% purebred labs were false or failed tests. We were pretty upset that this fairly important fact was left out by the sales rep and we refused to carry the tests.
The other thing that concerned me was that the tests we carried required a blood sample, some of those tests owners can order only require a saliva sample so I can only imagine how truly accurate those are. That was well over 3 years ago though so the tests could be more accurate but I have read a few previous comments people have made here that make me think otherwise. Just thought i'd pass that information on, I have never seen it mentioned anywhere else so I don't think it is common knowledge...
Comment